From another world


At first I thought this was cleverly written spam. But there was no link...

On 6/28/06, Clifford Megan <clifford_megan@bah.com> wrote:

Jim,

I know we did not have any luck earlier today getting Joanne's assessment into my OLA inbox, but try hitting "send assessment" (not send for signature) and enter my name.   This might work.

I spoke with Larry, and he does not have to re-brief the assessment tomorrow if she is not a promotion candidate.  Given our conversation and the feedback/info you received from others during the data gathering stage, we should stick with keeping this assessment at an Overall Meets.  Therefore, Joanne is not a promotion candidate at this time.  So, there is no urgency is making changes to the assessment tonight.

Per your suggestion, I would consider moving Work Quality down to a Meets.

Also, in looking at the competencies in the white box, which are the ones she is measured against, I am not sure that she is exceeding in Task Execution due to this statement: 

Manages tasks of others or coordinates multiple assignments and monitors schedule.  We have seen her manage Erin and monitor work schedules, but only a limited amount.  This might be an area that she can further focus on and gain more experience in to have an Exceeds rating.  If Task Execution is lowered to a Meets, this would give her 2 exceeds and 2 meets in assignment performance, giving her an overall Meets in the category.

Please let me know your thoughts on these two changes.  I do not believe the narrative has to be changed if we are only giving her a Meets, but Larry might have other thoughts on this.

Thanks,
Megan

(read more for reply)
 
Megan,

I believe you sent this to the wrong person. I am an animation artist living in Los Angeles with the email address "jim.mortensen@gmail.com".

Good luck to Joanne pulling up her performance review numbers, though.

Jim Mortensen
Posted: Thursday - June 29, 2006 at at 01:48 PM     |

©